🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an celebration that started out as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, expanding to include events where Black people are compensated to address white audiences about implicit prejudice and “allyship”. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests generated a rise in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the Netherlands.

The period has developed since those days, giving reduced attention to the accounts of colonial slavery and struggles for equality, and greater focus on notable African descendants in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and extensively acknowledging the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with talks and cultural events. But the way the observance is observed is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month better than the specific period in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the guise of the Reform political group is top in opinion ratings. In the warmer months we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a legislator feels emboldened to state that “not seeing any white faces” in parts of a city is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, far-right parties are surging in the European continent as a entirety.

In the US, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, often successfully, to the supreme judicial bodies of the state. A campaign to erase Black history and narrative from the archives is under way. One of the former president's early administrative commands targeted the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

Given these circumstances, the month illustrates how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized commemorations of historical achievements, rather than challenging the situation of the present. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is separated from the broader ongoing work that is needed. A university professor, a professor at a learning establishment, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The difficulty with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Figuring out how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just eliminate observances such as Black History Month altogether, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an era that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of activism for racial justice – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an framework that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not only to deteriorate as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a time that does not shy away from political issues, and allows opportunity for individuals, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What value has simple recognition of the bygone era when it fails to address the contemporary truth of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Organizations who mark it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to subtle slights, but faced with the dangers that affect everyone if anti-racism is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, urgent, and responsive. Maybe an complete renaming is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.